Yes Caloosamusa, it will be useful also for another in the further identification of plants, I will wait your pictures. Lorax, thanks for your opinion. Tog considered version Musa acuminata ssp. malaccensis. I looked its pictures and compared, it really two different kinds. But I have paid attention to version Musa acuminata ssp. malaccensis (Selangor). It not pure version Musa acuminata ssp. malaccensis, and has the features. I leant on Musalogue A catalogue of Musa germplasm. But also there there are disagreements, for example look description Musa basjoo.
Musa acuminata has many versions, I even itself very much was surprised that it still plainly and is not studied. Here the list from available versions and it, I is assured, not the full:
Musa acuminata ssp. acuminata
Musa acuminata ssp. alasensis
Musa acuminata ssp. banskii
Musa acuminata ssp. bantamensis
Musa acuminata ssp. breviformis
Musa acuminata ssp. burmannicoides (= Calcutta 4: Referenz specie INIBAP)
Musa acuminata ssp. burmannica
Musa acuminata ssp. cerifera
Musa acuminata ssp. errans
Musa acuminata ssp. halabanensis
Musa acuminata var. longepetiolata
Musa acuminata ssp. malaccensis
Musa acuminata ssp. microcarpa
Musa acuminata ssp. microcarpa Borneo
Musa acuminata var. nakaii
Musa acuminata var. rutifiles
Musa acuminata ssp. siamea
Musa acuminata ssp. truncata
Musa acuminata var. sumatrana
Musa acuminata var. tomentosa
Musa acuminata ssp. zebrina
At me is to steam of a photo of this version, Musa acuminata ssp. malaccensis (Selangor), but they do not show, unfortunately, all details:
Concerning puppies. It agree, they without wax, but wax began to appear on a plant in process of its growing. I wait still for opinions, write...