Thread: Occupy Our Food
View Single Post
Old 12-28-2011, 09:26 PM   #38 (permalink)
Richard
un-Retired
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Location: Vista, CA
Zone: USDA 10b
Name: Richard
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,674
BananaBucks : 552,519
Feedback: 9 / 100%
Said "Thanks" 3,636 Times
Was Thanked 12,543 Times in 4,721 Posts
Said "Welcome to Bananas" 1,685 Times
Default Re: Occupy Our Food

Quote:
Originally Posted by momoese View Post
It sounds like this is what your speaking about, but the plants in question were tested and found contaminated.

Phantoms in the machine: GM corn spreads to Mexico
Yes, the plants were contaminated as they have been elsewhere.

The issue is that in most cases the economic loss is a fallacy because either (1) the farmer was going to buy and plant new seed anyway, or (2) the farmer could buy new high quality non-GMO seed inexpensively but instead expends a greater amount of cost and labor harvesting their own seed.

ALSO, I believe you know that the fertilization of corn, grain, or whatever by pollen from a Monsanto strain or any other strain does not change the nature of the harvested food? It only changes the genetics of plants grown from seed of that crop.

So for example, we can have an organic, non-GMO grain plantation which is cross pollinated with some pollen from a non-organic GMO source. That "contaminated" crop is still considered organic and non-GMO. However, if you were to let some of those grains mature, harvest the seed, and plant them, then the crop it produces is definitely a GMO product. Ironically, if it were grown certified organic, it would be considered a certified organic GMO crop.
__________________
Back in business at plantsthatproduce.com
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote Send A Private Message To Richard